Second
Council of Constantinople
May
5-June 2 AD 553
The
Capitula of the Council.
Anathema
One
If anyone shall
not confess that the nature or essence of the Father, of the Son, and of the
Holy Ghost is one, as also the force and the power; [if anyone does not
confess] a consubstantial Trinity, one Godhead to be worshipped in three
subsistences or Persons: let him be anathema. For there is but one
God even the Father of whom are all things, and one Lord Jesus Christ through
whom are all things, and one Holy Spirit in whom are all things.
Anathema
Two
If anyone shall
not confess that the Word of God has two nativities, the one from all eternity
of the Father, without time and without body; the other in these last days,
coming down from heaven and being made flesh of the holy and glorious Mary,
Mother of God and always a virgin, and born of her: let him be anathema.
Anathema
Three
If anyone shall
say that the wonder-working Word of God is one [Person] and the Christ that
suffered another; or shall say that God the Word was with the woman-born
Christ, or was in him as one person in another, but that he was not one and the
same our Lord Jesus Christ, the Word of God, incarnate and made man, and that
his miracles and the sufferings which of his own will he endured in the flesh
were not of the same [Person]: let him be anathema.
Anathema
Four
If anyone shall
say that the union of the Word of God to man was only according to grace or
energy, or dignity, or equality of honour, or authority, or relation, or
effect, or power, or according to good pleasure in this sense that God the Word
was pleased with a man, that is to say, that he loved him for his own sake, as
says the senseless Theodorus, or [if anyone pretends that this union exists
only] so far as likeness of name is concerned, as the Nestorians understand,
who call also the Word of God Jesus and Christ, and even accord to the man the
names of Christ and of Son, speaking thus clearly of two persons, and only
designating disingenuously one Person and one Christ when the reference is to
his honour, or his dignity, or his worship; if anyone shall not acknowledge as
the Holy Fathers teach, that the union of God the Word is made with the flesh
animated by a reasonable and living soul, and that such union is made
synthetically and hypostatically, and that therefore there is only one Person,
to wit: our Lord Jesus Christ, one of the Holy Trinity: let him be
anathema. As a matter of fact the word “union” (τῆς ἑνώςεως) has many meanings, and the
partisans of Apollinaris and Eutyches have affirmed that these natures are
confounded inter se, and have asserted a union produced by the
mixture of both. On the other hand the followers of Theodorus and of
Nestorius rejoicing in the division of the natures, have taught only a relative
union. Meanwhile the Holy Church of God, condemning equally the impiety
of both sorts of heresies, recognises the union of God the Word with the flesh
synthetically, that is to say, hypostatically. For in the mystery of
Christ the synthetical union not only preserves unconfusedly the natures which
are united, but also allows no separation.
Anathema
Five
If anyone
understands the expression “one only Person of our Lord Jesus Christ” in this
sense, that it is the union of many hypostases, and if he attempts thus to
introduce into the mystery of Christ two hypostases, or two Persons, and, after
having introduced two persons, speaks of one Person only out of dignity, honour
or worship, as both Theodorus and Nestorius insanely have written; if anyone
shall calumniate the holy Council of Chalcedon, pretending that it made use of
this expression [one hypostasis] in this impious sense, and if he will not
recognize rather that the Word of God is united with the flesh hypostatically,
and that therefore there is but one hypostasis or one only Person, and that the
holy Council of Chalcedon has professed in this sense the one Person of our Lord
Jesus Christ: let him be anathema. For since one of the Holy
Trinity has been made man, viz.: God the Word, the Holy Trinity has not
been increased by the addition of another person or hypostasis.
Anathema
Six
If anyone shall
not call in a true acceptation, but only in a false acceptation, the holy,
glorious, and ever-virgin Mary, the Mother of God, or shall call her so only in
a relative sense, believing that she bare only a simple man and that God the
word was not incarnate of her, but that the incarnation of God the Word
resulted only from the fact that he united himself to that man who was born [of
her]; if he shall calumniate the Holy Synod of Chalcedon as though it had
asserted the Virgin to be Mother of God according to the impious sense of Theodore;
or if anyone shall call her the mother of a man (ἀνθρωποτόκον)
or the Mother of Christ (Χριστοτόκον),
as if Christ were not God, and shall not confess that she is exactly and truly
the Mother of God, because that God the Word who before all ages was begotten
of the Father was in these last days made flesh and born of her, and if anyone
shall not confess that in this sense the holy Synod of Chalcedon acknowledged
her to be the Mother of God: let him be anathema.
Anathema
Seven
If anyone using
the expression, “in two natures,” does not confess that our one Lord Jesus
Christ has been revealed in the divinity and in the humanity, so as to
designate by that expression a difference of the natures of which an ineffable
union is unconfusedly made, [a union] in which neither the nature of the Word
was changed into that of the flesh, nor that of the flesh into that of the
Word, for each remained that it was by nature, the union being hypostatic; but
shall take the expression with regard to the mystery of Christ in a sense so as
to divide the parties, or recognising the two natures in the only Lord Jesus,
God the Word made man, does not content himself with taking in a theoretical
manner the difference of the natures which compose him, which difference is
not destroyed by the union between them, for one is composed of the two and the
two are in one, but shall make use of the number [two] to divide the natures or
to make of them Persons properly so called: let him be anathema.
Anathema
Eight
If anyone uses the
expression “of two natures,” confessing that a union was made of the Godhead
and of the humanity, or the expression “the one nature made flesh of God the
Word,” and shall not so understand those expressions as the holy Fathers have
taught, to wit: that of the divine and human nature there was made an
hypostatic union, whereof is one Christ; but from these expressions shall try
to introduce one nature or substance [made by a mixture] of the Godhead and
manhood of Christ; let him be anathema. For in teaching that the
only-begotten Word was united hypostatically [to humanity] we do not mean to
say that there was made a mutual confusion of natures, but rather each [nature]
remaining what it was, we understand that the Word was united to the
flesh. Wherefore there is one Christ, both God and man, consubstantial
with the Father as touching his Godhead, and consubstantial with us as touching
his manhood. Therefore they are equally condemned and anathematized
by the Church of God, who divide or part the mystery of the divine dispensation
of Christ, or who introduce confusion into that mystery.
Anathema
Nine
If anyone shall
take the expression, Christ ought to be worshipped in his two natures, in the
sense that he wishes to introduce thus two adorations, the one in special
relation to God the Word and the other as pertaining to the man; or if anyone
to get rid of the flesh, [that is of the humanity of Christ,] or to mix
together the divinity and the humanity, shall speak monstrously of one only
nature or essence (φύσιν ἤγουν οὐσίαν)
of the united (natures), and so worship Christ, and does not venerate, by one
adoration, God the Word made man, together with his flesh, as the Holy Church
has taught from the beginning: let him be anathema.
Anathema
Ten
If anyone does
not confess that our Lord Jesus Christ who was crucified in the flesh is true
God and the Lord of Glory and one of the Holy Trinity: let him be
anathema.
Anathema
Eleven
If anyone does
not anathematize Arius, Eunomius, Macedonius, Apollinaris, Nestorius, Eutyches
and Origen, as well as their impious writings, as also all other heretics
already condemned and anathematized by the Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church,
and by the aforesaid four Holy Synods and [if anyone does not equally
anathematize] all those who have held and hold or who in their impiety persist
in holding to the end the same opinion as those heretics just mentioned:
let him be anathema.
No comments:
Post a Comment